By reading two presidential endorsements about Barack Obama and John McCain I think that both of them present a good argument. However the one to have a stronger argument is Obama's endorsement. In Barack Obama's the endorsement is trying to convince the reader of how he can fix the mistakes president Bush had made in the past few years. In McCain's endorsement, the same technique is used but in a less detailed manner. Obama's uses real life situations to prove his point while on the other hand McCain uses less details and mentions repeatedly that he is more experienced then Obama as a leader.
Obama's endorsement, talks about how he wants change for America and he will fix all of the mistakes president Bush has made in the past. Obama focuses on the education of children living in America and he says in one of his speeches that “Government cannot solve all our problems." He has a point when he says that. We have to step up and bring change ourselves too.
He also focuses on the economy. He believes that the American tax structure should be changed. When it comes to foreign affairs Obama does not like the fact that the United States gets involved in them. He also wants to reform the United nations. His endorsement is mainly trying to say that Obama can really bring change in America when compared to McCain. That's because the endorsement is trying to say that McCain will continue what president Bush did in the past years for America. This presents a good argument saying that we need a new not only the first African American but also American to change America.
McCain's argument also provides a good argument. He also wants the best for America as described in his endorsement. It mostly talks about how McCain is more experienced when compared to Obama, so for this reason he can control the United States in a better way. It talks about how he will keep us safe and more secured. Not many details are provided in his endorsement when compared to Obama's endorsement.
